By 2016, such language was gone.
Publications may have given hyperbolic coverage to the Comey letter in part because they misanalyzed the Electoral College and wrongly concluded that online video slots for free Clinton was a sure thing.
If we can sympathize with others, they will appreciate our side as well and will often come around to our way of thinking.
Lets play the blame game The Comey letter wasnt necessarily the most important factor in Clintons defeat, although its probably the one we can be most certain about.Americas immigration system, in other words, pits two of the groups liberals care about mostthe native-born poor and the immigrant pooragainst each other.The impact of Comeys letter is comparatively easy to quantify, by contrast.The newspapers editors and reporters thought Clinton had the election in the bag.This means dusting off a concept many on the left currently hate: assimilation.12 Dale Carnegie liked the transcript so much he decided to edit winstar casino human resources phone number and revise it into a final form.This pattern may have reflected some sort of complicated feedback loop in media coverage.But its not credible to claim that the Comey letter had no effect at all.Thus, you have to assess the letters impact to do an honest accounting of the Clinton campaign.Perhaps Clintons lead would have been whittled down to around.5 points anyway by Election Day because of mean-reversion.The letter isnt the only reason that Clinton lost.Increase your earning power.
The hard part, which Hillary Clinton largely ignored in her 2016 presidential run, is backing tough immigration enforcement so that path to citizenship doesnt become a magnet that entices more immigrants to enter the.S.
It begins by describing the Comey letter in dramatic terms, as the kind of potential turnabout rarely if ever seen at this late stage of a presidential race: Everything was looking up for Hillary Clinton.